A blog about history, genealogy, conspiracies, research, and whatever else is on my mind!
The Mysterious Devil's Footprints
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
An interesting phenomenon I read about today.
One
cold winter morning in 1855, the residents of Devon, England, woke to a
strange sight. Snow had blanketed the ground overnight, and
crisscrossing the white countryside were sets of
mysterious tracks. While they appeared to be left by hooves, they dotted
the snow in a single-file line, like an animal walking on two legs,
placing one hoof in front of the other. What's more, these strange
tracks ran for miles, crossing places where no normal animal could
reach.
This wasn't the only one of Devon's strange occurrences,
but for decades, the so-called "Devil's Footprints" have perplexed both
skeptics and believers alike. While Devon is perhaps the most popular
instance of Devil's Footprints, similar incidents have occurred
throughout history and around the world.
Mysterious Cloven Hoofprints Appeared In Over 30 Locations Across The English Countryside
The bizarre footprints that appeared on Devon's snowy countryside followed no discernable path, and they appeared in more than 30 different locations
all over the town's south and east ends. They meandered across dozens
of miles, even leading up to people's doorsteps, frightening the
residents.
Most unusual, however, was the fact that they reached places no
animal could go - over house roofs and haystacks, through barns, up
walls, across the frozen Exe Estuary, and even through pipes no more
than four inches in diameter.
The Total Distance Of The Tracks Was Between 40 And 100 Miles
While later accounts of similar phenomena have been limited in scope, Devon's "Devil's Footprints" covered up to 100 miles
of land, reaching as far as Topsham, Dawlish, and Teignmouth. According
to some reports, the tracks may also have reached as far south as
Totnes and Torquay and as far away as Dorset or Lincolnshire.
Overall, the strange hoofprints were found spanning an area of
anywhere from 40 to 100 miles, making most rational explanations seem
implausible.
Extreme Weather Perfectly Primed The Terrain For The Hoofprints
Without
a fresh snowfall, the distinctive marks would have been imperceptible
to locals. Moreover, while accounts of the snowfall's heaviness seem to
vary, most agree not only that the previous night was particularly cold,
but that a thaw occurred sometime before morning, which may have
allowed animal tracks to become distorted.
Skeptics often point to this theory to explain the bizarre phenomenon of the Devil's Footprints.
The unexplained tracks shortly acquired the nickname "the Devil's Footprints" or "tracks of Satan,"
thanks in part to their hoof-like shape. This supernatural implication
was aided by the tracks' unexplainable, miles-long path. People came to
believe that the "Devil walks in Devon," as newspapers would later claim, and took to staying indoors after dark.
Some observers even claimed the tracks appeared burned or branded into the snow. This claim was seemingly substantiated in 1957 when an anthropologist and psychical researcher reported hoofprints found
on a Devon beach that "looked as if each mark had been cut out of the
sand with a flat iron." These 1957 hoofprints were also spaced six feet
apart, implying a much longer stride than those reported in 1855.
Also in 1957, Lynda Hanson wrote to the Fortean Times detailing
tracks she found in her parents' garden. Her description matched the
Devil's Footprints of 1855 almost exactly, and beneath these tracks, she
claimed to see dry concrete, as if the tracks had not just melted the
snow, but transformed it.
After The Footprints Appeared, Locals Were Too Afraid To Venture Out At Night
According
to some accounts, people genuinely came to believe the Devil was
responsible for the tracks and refused to venture outside after dark.
Convinced the Devil was still prowling Devon, they claimed he could "sniff out their sins."
Further fueling their fears was the manner in which the footprints
seemed to approach doorways and then stop, as if the creature
responsible was keenly interested in the people on the other side.
First-Hand Accounts Of The Event Are Rare And Veiled In Mystery
While some sources claim the phenomenon was widely covered in newspapers
at the time, first-hand accounts of the Devil's Footprints were
difficult to locate for many years. Not until 1950 did accounts of the
event return to the public eye.
References to the incident were discovered in records from the former
vicar of Clyst St. George. Among these papers were tracings or sketches
of the tracks themselves, as well as a letter to The Illustrated London News marked "not for publication."
The letter described the tracks as "the perfect impression of a
donkey's hoof," but "instead of progressing as that animal would have
done (or indeed as any other would have done), feet right and left, it
appeared that foot had followed foot in a single line." Furthermore, the
letter noted that the tracks were found in multiple parishes and that,
in every case, they were the exact same size - about four inches by
two inches - and always the same distance apart.
Several courageous individuals attempted to follow the strange
tracks, and some reported strange findings. A story credited to Reverend
J. J. Rowe and R. H. Busk claims the pair tried to follow the trail
with hounds but, "At last, in a wood, the hounds came back baying and terrified."
Another report tells of a man who followed the prints to their apparent end, where he found nothing but a toad.
Skeptics Theorize That At Least Some Of The Hoofprints Were A Hoax
Since
the prints in Devon were so numerous and covered such a broad area,
multiple sources were likely responsible. This is one of the underlying
tenets of skeptics who claim at least some of the hoofprints were likely
the work of hoaxers, if the marks existed at all.
As Brian Dunning points out on the hoofprints' episode of the Skeptoid podcast,
the very length of the trails discredits the notion that any one source
could possibly have seen all the tracks. "In 1855, the means didn't
really exist in Devon to travel 100 miles in a single day to verify the
length of this track, especially when the way is obstructed by two-mile
stretches of water," Dunning said.
In detailing the various fantastic properties of the footprints,
Dunning reaches what he considers a foregone conclusion: "...is there
really any reason to believe that this happened?"
Mice, Kangaroos, And Badgers Have Also Been Blamed For The Footprints
Skeptics have attempted to advance a pantheon of reasonable explanations for the Devil's Footprints. One popular theory claims that kangaroos or wallabies loosed themselves from a nearby private owner, possible a Mr. Fische.
As Brian Dunning points out on the Skeptoid podcast, "kangaroo tracks were almost certainly unfamiliar to residents of England in 1855."
Other theories include badgers, field mice - who often hop in snow,
leaving distinctive V-shaped tracks - unusual weather conditions,
or perhaps more likely, a combination of different elements. Some
skeptics simply dismiss the entire incident as a hoax or "mass
hysteria."
Mike Dash, a Welsh writer and historian, proposed that the tracks
were made by several different animals, though he conceded at the end of
his study that his solutions did not explain all of the tracks' elements, and they are still a mystery waiting to be solved.
One Explanation For The Tracks Involved An 'Experimental Balloon'
One
theory on the hoofprints, attributed to British novelist Geoffrey
Household, claimed that the tracks were actually made by some sort of "experimental balloon"
accidentally released from the Devonport Dockyard. According to
Household, a pair of shackles dangled from the balloon's mooring ropes,
and their intermittent dragging left tracks in the snow.
Household claimed to have learned of this event from a man whose
grandfather had worked at the docks in 1855. While this explanation
initially seems feasible, the theory is not entirely sound.
The notion of a drifting balloon leaving uniformly spaced tracks
seems implausible, and what's more, no such balloon was ever reported.
According to Household's account, however, the event was covered up
after the balloon caused some damage and eventually landed near Honiton.
Even Modern-Day Researchers Say Not All The Prints Can Be Explained
When
Jill Wade of Woolsery, North Devon, spotted tracks similar to the
Devil's Footprints in her backyard in 2009, she asked a biologist
to investigate them. Graham Inglis of the Centre for Fortean
Zoology noted the tracks' similarity to the Devil's Footprints from more
than 150 years before but concluded that, while he was unsure what
caused the tracks, they weren't of infernal origin.
"The footprints are peculiar," he told the Telegraph, "but they are not the Devil's - I don't believe the horned one has been in Woolsery."
One Theorist Claims Aliens Were Responsible For The Phenomenon
In his book The Case for the UFO,
astronomer Morris K. Jessup mentions the Devil's Footprints of Devon,
hypothesizing that, "No animal walks by putting one foot directly in
front of the other, so these holes in the snow were made with mechanical
precision by something mechanical. Therefore, let's make the broad
conclusion that something mechanical passed over Devon in the air."
Jessup goes on to theorize that the marks were possibly the result of some type of ray or beam.
Other Cases Have Been Reported Around The World
While the Devil's Footprints in Devon are the most famous instance of this phenomenon, other occurrences of similar tracks appearing in the snow range from the Kerguelen Islands near Madagascar to Belgium and Scotland and back to Devon.
Most predate widespread photography, but the most recent instance
occurred in 2009 when Jill Wade of North Devon reported similar tracks
forming an arc across her backyard.
In 1945, tracks were found in the snow behind Belgium's Chateau de
Morveau. Like Devon's 1855 footprints, this set moved in a straight
line and looked like the prints of an animal with cloven hooves.
In fact, one observer specifically compared the 1945 tracks to
Devon's footprints. Perhaps the strangest quality of the 1945 set was
that they moved over the tops of snowdrifts with no evidence of any
weight causing them to sink deeper into the snow.
This Incident Was Just One In A Long History Of Devil's Footprints
Several
cases similar to Devon's Devil's Footprints have been reported all over
the world. A cathedral in Munich is home to a single tile bearing a
footprint said to have been made by a frustrated Devil, tricked into aiding the cathedral's construction.
Similarly, a stone in a rock wall in Manchester, ME, bears marks left behind when a construction worker struck a deal with the Devil to move the large stone. At the Devils' Gate Dam in Pasadena, CA, photographers have captured images of claw marks in stone.
A comic book series called The Devil's Footprints, written by Scott Allie, received its title and inspiration from a legend Allie remembers from his hometown:
The Devil reportedly showed up at the local church in the old town,
and the priest chased him up the steeple. The Devil jumped, and left one
footprint in the stone outside.
The KJV Only movement is a belief on the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible - also known as the Authorised Version (AV) or the Authorised King James Version (AKJV) - that ranges from preferring it over other, later translations, to the belief that it's inspired, perfect, and superior to the original Hebrew & Greek texts, and that all other translations are intentionally corrupt, satanic, and unreliable. The former is of course entirely a matter of personal preference & opinion, and you won't hear criticism of it from me. The latter on the other hand... well, that's the focus of this article. First, some historic background (although most will be at least partly familiar with it: following his coronation as King of England and Ireland in 1604, King James I (VI of Scotland) commissioned a new translation of the Bible into English. The project was handed over to committees - each of which translated a separate portion of the Bible - which separately compl...
You will find in the Bible and in innumerable ancient legends references to giant; humanoids who were (often much) taller (and stronger) than normal. (Gigantism – where a person is abnormally large, but weak – is entirely different.) They often have a supernatural origin, the result of a union between supernatural beings and human women. The Bible calls them the Nephillim and Rephaim. The Greeks called them the Titans. They don’t fit into Evolution, and so are generally regarded as myths. However, there is direct evidence – PHYSICAL evidence – that they were (and probably still are) very real. The following is an article titled Traces of Giants Discovered Worldwide from Tales from Out There: The skeletons of giants were removed; whenever a new one appears the bones are quickly removed; they are carried far away to big hangars hidden from the public eye or are destroyed. The Smithsonian Institute has admitted in court tha...
Well, today (in Australia) is Christmas Day. Quite possibly THE most popular holiday in the world (although the media’s trying to make horrid Halloween more and more popular). For those of you who celebrate it, I hope you’re having/have a great day. For those of you (like me) for whom it’s just another normal day (and no, that’s not “legalistic”), I hope you’re having/have a great day. Although it’s become lost in modern consumerism, Christmas is claimed to be a celebration of Christ’s birthday – although it’s generally agreed that He wasn’t born on that day. Some of you might remember my post Christmas , in which I argued that it is an appropriated pagan festival (see Deuteronomy 12:30-31, Matthew 5, and Does the Torah Still Apply? ). However, I have since discovered that some of the claims are false. “False” as in I’m seriously questioning my view of Christmas as a pagan festival. I’m going to go through each incorrect (or only partially correct...
Comments
Post a Comment